Death penalty

DNA frees man - 18 years later. It is cases like this that have made me change my views on death penalty. I used to think a person that killed or raped or hurt a child deserved to die. Then I saw the movie Life of David Gale. They proved to me that there will always be resonable doubt, that no matter what evidence there is, what people saw, we will never know 100% what happened in the majority crimes. So I no longer believe in the death penalty. Especially when people can be convicted of a crime and then 18 years later be freed when they prove it wasn't him. Poor man.

Comments

teacherwoman said…
I don't like the death penalty either. But, if someone is proven guilty, by DNA especially, I would have to say they deserve to spend their sorry a** in jail. Maybe even put on death row. The sad thing is, even with the death penalty in some states, our prisons are growing fast with little or no room for inmates. Sad.

Why can't everyone just get along.
cdoc said…
This is probably not what you meant, but I don't think putting people on death row will solve our growing prison problem. You are right, we all should just get along, we need to find solutions to stop crimes instead of focusing on how to punish them. Also, DNA testing doesn't always prove anything. If you read the link to the article about the man freed 18 years later, DNA tests were done in December, but they were inconclusive because they didn't do advanced testing. When they did the more advanced testing just recently, they found he was not connected to the crime and freed. I am sure the advanced testing is expensive, so they don't always do it, and the less advanced testing obviously doesn't always prove things right since it didn't for this man in December. So like I said, there will always be reasonable doubt, which is why I am against the death penalty.
Anonymous said…
We are one of the ONLY "civilized" countries in the world that have the death penalty. The other ones have since realized or always knew that the death penalty will neither deter people from committing crimes nor punish those that do the crimes (esp. in light of wrongful convictions). I think we should try to learn a little from the world community ... most of these countries have been around for FAAAAAARRRRRR longer than we have.
teacherwoman said…
That wasn't what I mean, I am sorry it came off that way! Oops. I am strongly against the DP as well. But, I do believe that in some cases it can "seem" like the right thing to do. As such as the Dru Sjodin case. And there is definitely enough information to say that he did commit that crime. Sometimes it seems as if it is only an eye for eye....very interesting topic.
I am against the death penalty for the sheer idea that death does not deter crime. Also, the innocent who are found guilty weigh on my mind, along with the question "is death justice?" Does that vindicate the victim? I don't think it does.

Popular posts from this blog

"Absence makes the heart grow fonder"

What do I do?

Target